| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/abstract
|
Wouters v Algemene Raad van de Nederlandse … Wouters v Algemene Raad van de Nederlandse Orde van Advocaten (2002) C-309/99 is an important decision of the European Court of Justice concerning competition law and the freedom of establishment. In both of these areas, the ECJ held that restrictions could be justified on the grounds of legitimate public policy, in this case ensuring the impartiality of the legal profession, if the measures taken were both necessary and proportionate (and in the case of restrictions on competition, purely ancillary) to that objective.tion, purely ancillary) to that objective.
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageExternalLink
|
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/%3FisOldUri=true&uri=CELEX:61999CJ0309 +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageID
|
39750971
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageLength
|
1995
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageRevisionID
|
1069520901
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageWikiLink
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/EU_competition_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:European_Union_competition_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/European_Court_of_Justice +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:2002_in_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Legal_profession +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Public_policy +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:2002_in_the_European_Union +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/citations
|
C-309/99
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/court
|
European Court of Justice
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/fullName
|
Wouters v Algemene Raad van de Nederlandse Orde van Advocaten
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/keywords
|
Competition, regulation
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/name
|
Wouters v Nederlandse Orde van Advocaten
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Reflist +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Infobox_court_case +
|
| http://purl.org/dc/terms/subject
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:2002_in_the_European_Union +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:2002_in_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:European_Union_competition_case_law +
|
| http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/hypernym
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Decision +
|
| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wouters_v_Algemene_Raad_van_de_Nederlandse_Orde_van_Advocaten?oldid=1069520901&ns=0 +
|
| http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/isPrimaryTopicOf
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wouters_v_Algemene_Raad_van_de_Nederlandse_Orde_van_Advocaten +
|
| owl:sameAs |
http://rdf.freebase.com/ns/m.0w33t0q +
, http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q16908689 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Wouters_v_Algemene_Raad_van_de_Nederlandse_Orde_van_Advocaten +
, https://global.dbpedia.org/id/f1Fa +
|
| rdf:type |
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase +
|
| rdfs:comment |
Wouters v Algemene Raad van de Nederlandse … Wouters v Algemene Raad van de Nederlandse Orde van Advocaten (2002) C-309/99 is an important decision of the European Court of Justice concerning competition law and the freedom of establishment. In both of these areas, the ECJ held that restrictions could be justified on the grounds of legitimate public policy, in this case ensuring the impartiality of the legal profession, if the measures taken were both necessary and proportionate (and in the case of restrictions on competition, purely ancillary) to that objective.tion, purely ancillary) to that objective.
|
| rdfs:label |
Wouters v Algemene Raad van de Nederlandse Orde van Advocaten
|
