| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/abstract
|
Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 (1914 … Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 (1914), adalah perkara Mahkamah Agung Amerika Serikat mengenai penyitaan barang dari kediaman tanpa adanya surat perintah. Mahkamah memutuskan bahwa penyitaan tersebut melanggar Amendemen Keempat Konstitusi Amerika Serikat. Perkara ini juga melarang petugas kepolisian mengambil barang bukti dengan cara yang tidak sesuai dengan aturan pengecualian dan mereka juga tidak dapat menyerahkannya kepada rekan mereka di tingkat federal. Kemudian, dalam perkara , 367 U.S. 643 (1961), aturan pengecualian dinyatakan juga berlaku untuk pengadilan di tingkat negara bagian.untuk pengadilan di tingkat negara bagian.
, Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 (1914 … Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 (1914), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court unanimously held that the warrantless seizure of items from a private residence constitutes a violation of the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. It also prevented local officers from securing evidence by means prohibited under the federal exclusionary rule and giving it to their federal colleagues. It was not until the case of Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), that the exclusionary rule was deemed to apply to state courts as well.s deemed to apply to state courts as well.
, Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 (1914 … Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 (1914), war ein am 2. und 3. Dezember 1913 mündlich vor dem Obersten Gerichtshof der Vereinigten Staaten verhandelter Fall. Mit einstimmigem Urteil wurde am 24. Februar 1914 entschieden, dass die Beschlagnahme von Objekten in privaten Wohnungen ohne vorherigen richterlichen Beschluss gegen den 4. Zusatzartikel der Bundesverfassung verstößt und dass diese vor Bundesgerichten nicht verwendet werden dürfen. Diese Entscheidung galt zunächst nicht für die Gerichte der Einzelstaaten; der Gerichtshof verbot aber, dass die lokalen Polizeikräfte die so erlangten Gegenstände an ihre Kollegen auf der Bundesebene weitergeben. In dem späteren Fall , 367 U.S. 643 (1961) wurde die Entscheidung auf Gerichte der Einzelstaaten ausgedehnt.auf Gerichte der Einzelstaaten ausgedehnt.
, 威克斯訴美國案（Weeks v. United States，《232 U.S. 383 (1914)》）是宗美國最高法院判例，法庭中大法官們一致認為，無令狀從私人住宅中扣押物品違反美國憲法第四修正案。本判例亦防止地方官員使用聯邦證據排除法則中的方式（本應於地方政府中禁止），來獲取相關證據並將證據提供給其聯邦同僚。州政府直到1961年的（《367 U.S. 643 (1961)》）後，才被允許使用證據排除法則。
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageExternalLink
|
http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep232/usrep232383/usrep232383.pdf +
, https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/232/383/ +
, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/232/383.html +
, https://www.oyez.org/cases/1900-1940/232us383 +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageID
|
1580237
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageLength
|
4362
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageRevisionID
|
1060503846
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageWikiLink
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Warrantless_searches_in_the_United_States +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/U.S._LEXIS +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_privacy_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/L._Ed. +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_Fourth_Amendment_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:1914_in_United_States_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/False_evidence +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Exclusionary_rule +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Mapp_v._Ohio +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_White_Court +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/US_Marshals +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Kansas_City%2C_Missouri +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/U.S._Constitution +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Search_and_seizure +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/State_court_%28United_States%29 +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/arguedatea
|
--12-02
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/arguedateb
|
3
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/argueyear
|
1913
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/case
|
Weeks v. United States,
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/decidedate
|
--02-24
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/decideyear
|
1914
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/findlaw
|
https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/232/383.html +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/fullname
|
Fremont Weeks v. United States
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/holding
|
The warrantless seizure of documents from … The warrantless seizure of documents from a private home violated the Fourth Amendment prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures, and evidence obtained in this manner is excluded from use in federal criminal prosecutions. Western District of Missouri reversed and remanded.istrict of Missouri reversed and remanded.
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/joinmajority
|
unanimous
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/justia
|
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/232/383/ +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/lawsapplied
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/litigants
|
Weeks v. United States
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/loc
|
http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep232/usrep232383/usrep232383.pdf +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/majority
|
Day
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/oyez
|
https://www.oyez.org/cases/1900-1940/232us383 +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/parallelcitations
|
34
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/prior
|
Defendant convicted, W.D. Mo. Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Missouri
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/uspage
|
383
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/usvol
|
232
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Reflist +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Infobox_SCOTUS_case +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Wikisource-inline +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:US4thAmendment +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Short_description +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Caselaw_source +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Ussc +
|
| http://purl.org/dc/terms/subject
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:1914_in_United_States_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_Fourth_Amendment_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_privacy_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_White_Court +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases +
|
| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weeks_v._United_States?oldid=1060503846&ns=0 +
|
| http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/isPrimaryTopicOf
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weeks_v._United_States +
|
| http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name
|
Fremont Weeks v. United States
|
| owl:sameAs |
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Weeks_v._United_States +
, http://zh.dbpedia.org/resource/%E5%A8%81%E5%85%8B%E6%96%AF%E8%A8%B4%E7%BE%8E%E5%9C%8B%E6%A1%88 +
, http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q7979540 +
, http://de.dbpedia.org/resource/Weeks_v._United_States +
, http://rdf.freebase.com/ns/m.05d15m +
, http://yago-knowledge.org/resource/Weeks_v._United_States +
, http://id.dbpedia.org/resource/Weeks_v._United_States +
, https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4xSLv +
|
| rdf:type |
http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases +
, http://dbpedia.org/ontology/SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase +
, http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q2334719 +
, http://dbpedia.org/ontology/Case +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Event100029378 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Case107308889 +
, http://dbpedia.org/ontology/LegalCase +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Abstraction100002137 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Happening107283608 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/PsychologicalFeature100023100 +
, http://dbpedia.org/ontology/UnitOfWork +
|
| rdfs:comment |
Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 (1914 … Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 (1914), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court unanimously held that the warrantless seizure of items from a private residence constitutes a violation of the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. It also prevented local officers from securing evidence by means prohibited under the federal exclusionary rule and giving it to their federal colleagues. It was not until the case of Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), that the exclusionary rule was deemed to apply to state courts as well.s deemed to apply to state courts as well.
, Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 (1914 … Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 (1914), war ein am 2. und 3. Dezember 1913 mündlich vor dem Obersten Gerichtshof der Vereinigten Staaten verhandelter Fall. Mit einstimmigem Urteil wurde am 24. Februar 1914 entschieden, dass die Beschlagnahme von Objekten in privaten Wohnungen ohne vorherigen richterlichen Beschluss gegen den 4. Zusatzartikel der Bundesverfassung verstößt und dass diese vor Bundesgerichten nicht verwendet werden dürfen. In dem späteren Fall , 367 U.S. 643 (1961) wurde die Entscheidung auf Gerichte der Einzelstaaten ausgedehnt.auf Gerichte der Einzelstaaten ausgedehnt.
, Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 (1914 … Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 (1914), adalah perkara Mahkamah Agung Amerika Serikat mengenai penyitaan barang dari kediaman tanpa adanya surat perintah. Mahkamah memutuskan bahwa penyitaan tersebut melanggar Amendemen Keempat Konstitusi Amerika Serikat. Perkara ini juga melarang petugas kepolisian mengambil barang bukti dengan cara yang tidak sesuai dengan aturan pengecualian dan mereka juga tidak dapat menyerahkannya kepada rekan mereka di tingkat federal. Kemudian, dalam perkara , 367 U.S. 643 (1961), aturan pengecualian dinyatakan juga berlaku untuk pengadilan di tingkat negara bagian.untuk pengadilan di tingkat negara bagian.
, 威克斯訴美國案（Weeks v. United States，《232 U.S. 383 (1914)》）是宗美國最高法院判例，法庭中大法官們一致認為，無令狀從私人住宅中扣押物品違反美國憲法第四修正案。本判例亦防止地方官員使用聯邦證據排除法則中的方式（本應於地方政府中禁止），來獲取相關證據並將證據提供給其聯邦同僚。州政府直到1961年的（《367 U.S. 643 (1961)》）後，才被允許使用證據排除法則。
|
| rdfs:label |
Weeks v. United States
, 威克斯訴美國案
|
