Browse Wiki & Semantic Web

Jump to: navigation, search
Http://dbpedia.org/resource/Vicious intromission
  This page has no properties.
hide properties that link here 
  No properties link to this page.
 
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Vicious_intromission
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/abstract Vicious intromission is a term of Scots laVicious intromission is a term of Scots law denoting the unauthorised assumption of ownership, or other interference with the rights of an estate. In 1771 James Boswell appeared before the Court of Session in Wilson vs Smith and Armour, arguing for a return to the principle that the punishment for vicious intromission should be restored to its traditional severity, of rendering the intromittor liable to pay all the debts of the estate. His attempt was unsuccessful, but led to an exchange with his friend Doctor Johnson in July 1772, recorded in his Life of Samuel Johnson, in which the latter wrote a paper on the legal principles involved, stating misera est servitus ubi jus est aut incognitum aut vagum ("miserable is that state of slavery in which the law is unknown or uncertain").n which the law is unknown or uncertain").
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageID 24168584
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageLength 1335
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageRevisionID 1084216953
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageWikiLink http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Scots_law + , http://dbpedia.org/resource/James_Boswell + , http://dbpedia.org/resource/Life_of_Samuel_Johnson + , http://dbpedia.org/resource/Court_of_Session + , http://dbpedia.org/resource/Scots_law + , http://dbpedia.org/resource/Doctor_Johnson +
http://dbpedia.org/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:ISBN + , http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Use_dmy_dates + , http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Scotland-law-stub + , http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Cite_NIE +
http://purl.org/dc/terms/subject http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Scots_law +
http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/hypernym http://dbpedia.org/resource/Term +
http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vicious_intromission?oldid=1084216953&ns=0 +
http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/isPrimaryTopicOf http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vicious_intromission +
owl:sameAs http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q7925304 + , http://dbpedia.org/resource/Vicious_intromission + , http://rdf.freebase.com/ns/m.07khg9p + , https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4xmWv +
rdfs:comment Vicious intromission is a term of Scots laVicious intromission is a term of Scots law denoting the unauthorised assumption of ownership, or other interference with the rights of an estate. In 1771 James Boswell appeared before the Court of Session in Wilson vs Smith and Armour, arguing for a return to the principle that the punishment for vicious intromission should be restored to its traditional severity, of rendering the intromittor liable to pay all the debts of the estate. His attempt was unsuccessful, but led to an exchange with his friend Doctor Johnson in July 1772, recorded in his Life of Samuel Johnson, in which the latter wrote a paper on the legal principles involved, stating misera est servitus ubi jus est aut incognitum aut vagum ("miserable is that state of slavery in which the law is unknown or uncertain").n which the law is unknown or uncertain").
rdfs:label Vicious intromission
hide properties that link here 
http://dbpedia.org/resource/List_of_Latin_phrases_%28M%29 + , http://dbpedia.org/resource/Intromission + http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageWikiLink
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vicious_intromission + http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/primaryTopic
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Vicious_intromission + owl:sameAs
 

 

Enter the name of the page to start semantic browsing from.