| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/abstract
|
Sue v Hill was an Australian court case de … Sue v Hill was an Australian court case decided in the High Court of Australia on 23 June 1999. It concerned a dispute over the apparent return of a candidate, Heather Hill, to the Australian Senate in the 1998 federal election. The result was challenged on the basis that Hill was a dual citizen of the United Kingdom and Australia, and that section 44(i) of the Constitution of Australia prevents any person who is the citizen of a "foreign power" from being elected to the Parliament of Australia. The High Court found that, at least for the purposes of section 44(i), the United Kingdom is a foreign power to Australia.d Kingdom is a foreign power to Australia.
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/thumbnail
|
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Coat_of_Arms_of_Australia.svg?width=300 +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageID
|
5203968
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageLength
|
23461
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageRevisionID
|
1123904456
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageWikiLink
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Australian_constitutional_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Murray_Gleeson +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Australia_Act_1986 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Dominion +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Judicial_Committee_of_the_Privy_Council +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Henry_William_Rawson_Wade +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Solicitor-General_of_Australia +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Isaac_Isaacs +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Inter_alia +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:1999_in_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Kenneth_Hayne +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Separation_of_powers +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/United_Kingdom +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Australian_Broadcasting_Corporation +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Court_of_Disputed_Returns +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Section_51_of_the_Australian_Constitution +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Puisne_Justice +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Nationalist +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Parliament_of_the_United_Kingdom +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Australian_Greens +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Referendums_in_Australia +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Government_of_Australia +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Parliamentary_supremacy +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Multiple_citizenship +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Constitution_of_Australia +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Terry_Sharples +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Section_128_of_the_Australian_Constitution +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Michael_McHugh_%28judge%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Australian_Senate +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Multiple_citizenship +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Australia%E2%80%93United_Kingdom_relations +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/2017%E2%80%9318_Australian_parliamentary_eligibility_crisis +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/High_Court_of_Australia +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Kirmani_v_Captain_Cook_Cruises_Pty_Ltd_%28No_2%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Re_Canavan +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Parliament_of_Australia +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/British_Imperial_Parliament +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Commonwealth_Law_Reports +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Heather_Hill_%28politician%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/One_Nation_%28Australia%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Mary_Gaudron +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/A._V._Dicey +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/1998_Australian_federal_election +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/David_Bennett_%28barrister%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Queensland +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/British_citizenship +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Commonwealth_Electoral_Act_1918 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Balfour_Declaration_1926 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Michael_Kirby_%28judge%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Jurisdiction +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Bob_Brown +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Royal_and_Parliamentary_Titles_Act_1927 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:High_Court_of_Australia_cases +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Section_44_of_the_Australian_Constitution +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Chapter_III_Court +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Australian_court_of_disputed_returns_cases +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/1926_Imperial_Conference +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Ian_Callinan +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Len_Harris_%28politician%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Statute_of_Westminster_Adoption_Act_1942 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Chief_Justice_of_Australia +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:1999_in_Australian_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/William_Gummow +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/court
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/High_Court_of_Australia +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/dateDecided
|
"1999-06-23"^^xsd:date
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/fullName
|
Sue v Hill & Anor; Sharples v Hill & Anor
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/judges
|
Gleeson , Gaudron, McHugh, Gummow, Kirby, Hayne & Callinan
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/name
|
Sue v Hill
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/opinions
|
Non Deciding: McHugh, Kirby & Callinan
, Assent: Gleeson , Gaudron, Gummow & Hayne
, Dissent: McHugh, Kirby & Callinan
, Non-Deciding: McHugh, Kirby & Callinan
, the jurisdiction of the Court of Disputed Returns, as conferred on the High Court, involves the exercise of judicial power and is not inconsistent with the separation of powers
, That the High Court of Australia had Jurisdiction over the case.
, the United Kingdom is a "foreign power", for the purposes of section 44 of the Australian Constitution
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/priorActions
|
none
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/subsequentActions
|
none
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Authority_control +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Use_Australian_English +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Infobox_court_case +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Good_article +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Cite_AustLII +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Short_description +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Reflist +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Use_dmy_dates +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Main +
|
| http://purl.org/dc/terms/subject
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:1999_in_Australian_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Australia%E2%80%93United_Kingdom_relations +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Australian_court_of_disputed_returns_cases +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Multiple_citizenship +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Australian_constitutional_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:High_Court_of_Australia_cases +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:1999_in_case_law +
|
| http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/hypernym
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Case +
|
| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sue_v_Hill?oldid=1123904456&ns=0 +
|
| http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/depiction
|
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Coat_of_Arms_of_Australia.svg +
|
| http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/isPrimaryTopicOf
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sue_v_Hill +
|
| owl:sameAs |
http://rdf.freebase.com/ns/m.0d7pgk +
, http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q17025993 +
, https://global.dbpedia.org/id/fKh1 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Sue_v_Hill +
|
| rdf:type |
http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Case107308889 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Abstraction100002137 +
, http://dbpedia.org/ontology/SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Happening107283608 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/PsychologicalFeature100023100 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Event100029378 +
|
| rdfs:comment |
Sue v Hill was an Australian court case de … Sue v Hill was an Australian court case decided in the High Court of Australia on 23 June 1999. It concerned a dispute over the apparent return of a candidate, Heather Hill, to the Australian Senate in the 1998 federal election. The result was challenged on the basis that Hill was a dual citizen of the United Kingdom and Australia, and that section 44(i) of the Constitution of Australia prevents any person who is the citizen of a "foreign power" from being elected to the Parliament of Australia. The High Court found that, at least for the purposes of section 44(i), the United Kingdom is a foreign power to Australia.d Kingdom is a foreign power to Australia.
|
| rdfs:label |
Sue v Hill
|
