| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/abstract
|
Sherbert v. Verner, 374 U.S. 398 (1963), w … Sherbert v. Verner, 374 U.S. 398 (1963), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment required the government to demonstrate both a compelling interest and that the law in question was narrowly tailored before it denied unemployment compensation to someone who was fired because her job requirements substantially conflicted with her religion. The case established the Sherbert Test, requiring demonstration of such a compelling interest and narrow tailoring in all Free Exercise cases in which a religious person was substantially burdened by a law. The conditions are the key components of what is usually called strict scrutiny. In 1990, the Supreme Court decided that the Sherbert Test, as a judicial constitutional analysis tool, was too broad when applied to all laws. With respect to religiously neutral, generally applicable laws that incidentally burden religious exercise, the Sherbert Test was eliminated in Employment Division v. Smith. For laws that discriminate along religious/secular lines or neutral laws that are enforced in a discriminatory way, the components of the Sherbert Test are still appropriate constitutional tools for courts to use. In response to the 1990 Smith decision, Congress created an enhanced version of the Sherbert Test as a statutory, rather than constitutional, right in the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) of 1993. Its provisions were designed to apply broadly to all laws and regulations, both federal and state. Although Congress replaced the "narrowly tailored" constitutional requirement with a "least restrictive means" statutory requirement, the enhanced test is still referred to as the Sherbert Test. However, the Supreme Court held in City of Boerne v. Flores that the law was unconstitutional because its enhanced Sherbert Test, as a purported change in constitutional rights, could not be enforced against the states. It impermissibly interfered with the judiciary's sole power to interpret the Constitution. However, the ruling did not necessarily limit its effect on interpretation of federal statutes. In 2000, Congress passed the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA) that applied only to federal laws. Both laws contain the same language for an even further enhanced Sherbert Test, one that broadens the definition of substantial religious burden. The Supreme Court has since relied on the statutory Sherbert Test to decide several prominent cases, including Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, 573 U.S. 682 (2014), and Gonzales v. O Centro Espírita Beneficente União do Vegetal, 546 U.S. 418 (2006).nte União do Vegetal, 546 U.S. 418 (2006).
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageExternalLink
|
http://supreme.justia.com/us/374/398/case.html +
, https://www.oyez.org/cases/1962/526 +
, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=17526177081953259048 +
, https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/106660/sherbert-v-verner/ +
, http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/amendment01/05.html%235 +
, https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/374/398.html +
, http://www.firstamendmentschools.org/freedoms/faq.aspx%3Fid=12923 +
, https://archive.org/details/constitutionreli0000unse/page/449 +
, http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep374/usrep374398/usrep374398.pdf +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageID
|
5437780
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageLength
|
12322
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageRevisionID
|
1053583448
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageWikiLink
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Controlled_Substances_Act +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Religious_Land_Use_and_Institutionalized_Persons_Act +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Strict_scrutiny +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/L._Ed._2d +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Narrow_tailoring +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:History_of_the_Seventh-day_Adventist_Church +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Sabbath_in_Christianity +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/U.S._LEXIS +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Warren_Court +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Compelling_state_interest +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Religious_Freedom_Restoration_Act +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:1963_in_religion +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Seventh-day_Adventist_Church +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Free_Exercise_Clause_of_the_First_Amendment +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Employment_Division_v._Smith +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Establishment_Clause_of_the_First_Amendment +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Equal_Protection_Clause +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/City_of_Boerne_v._Flores +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Lemon_v._Kurtzman +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_free_exercise_of_religion_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Gonzales_v._O_Centro_Esp%C3%ADrita_Beneficente_Uni%C3%A3o_do_Vegetal +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:1963_in_United_States_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Braunfeld_v._Brown +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Burwell_v._Hobby_Lobby +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Unanimous_consent +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/arguedate
|
--04-24
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/argueyear
|
1963
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/case
|
Sherbert v. Verner,
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/concurrence
|
Douglas
, Stewart
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/courtlistener
|
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/106660/sherbert-v-verner/ +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/decidedate
|
--06-17
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/decideyear
|
1963
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/dissent
|
Harlan
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/findlaw
|
https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/374/398.html +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/fullname
|
Sherbert v. Verner et al., Members of South Carolina Employment Security Commission, et al.
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/googlescholar
|
https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=17526177081953259048 +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/holding
|
The Free Exercise Clause mandates strict scrutiny for unemployment compensation claims.
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/joindissent
|
White
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/joinmajority
|
Warren, Black, Douglas, Clark, Goldberg
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/justia
|
http://supreme.justia.com/us/374/398/case.html +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/lawsapplied
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/litigants
|
Sherbert v. Verner
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/loc
|
http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep374/usrep374398/usrep374398.pdf +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/majority
|
Brennan
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/oyez
|
https://www.oyez.org/cases/1962/526 +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/parallelcitations
|
172800.0
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/prior
|
172800.0
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/uspage
|
398
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/usvol
|
374
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Infobox_SCOTUS_case +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Ussc +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Caselaw_source +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:US1stAmendment +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Cite_book +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Reflist +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Wikisource-inline +
|
| http://purl.org/dc/terms/subject
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:History_of_the_Seventh-day_Adventist_Church +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:1963_in_United_States_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_free_exercise_of_religion_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:1963_in_religion +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Warren_Court +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases +
|
| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sherbert_v._Verner?oldid=1053583448&ns=0 +
|
| http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/isPrimaryTopicOf
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sherbert_v._Verner +
|
| http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name
|
Sherbert v. Verner et al., Members of South Carolina Employment Security Commission, et al.
|
| owl:sameAs |
https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4uyga +
, http://yago-knowledge.org/resource/Sherbert_v._Verner +
, http://rdf.freebase.com/ns/m.0dlwpv +
, http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q7494708 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Sherbert_v._Verner +
|
| rdf:type |
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase +
, http://dbpedia.org/ontology/Case +
, http://dbpedia.org/ontology/LegalCase +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Case107308889 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Happening107283608 +
, http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q2334719 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Event100029378 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Abstraction100002137 +
, http://dbpedia.org/ontology/UnitOfWork +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/PsychologicalFeature100023100 +
|
| rdfs:comment |
Sherbert v. Verner, 374 U.S. 398 (1963), w … Sherbert v. Verner, 374 U.S. 398 (1963), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment required the government to demonstrate both a compelling interest and that the law in question was narrowly tailored before it denied unemployment compensation to someone who was fired because her job requirements substantially conflicted with her religion.ubstantially conflicted with her religion.
|
| rdfs:label |
Sherbert v. Verner
|
