http://dbpedia.org/ontology/abstract
|
Selle v. Gibb, 741 F.2d 896 (7th Cir. 1984 … Selle v. Gibb, 741 F.2d 896 (7th Cir. 1984) was a landmark ruling on the doctrine of striking similarities. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit ruled that while copying must be proved by access and substantial similarity, where evidence of access does not exist, striking similarities may raise an inference of copying by showing that the work could not have been the result of independent creation, coincidence, or common source. Striking similarity alone is not enough to infer access. The similarity must preclude independent creation in order to infer access.pendent creation in order to infer access.
|
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageExternalLink
|
http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/ +
, https://web.archive.org/web/20090512025011/http:/www.ca7.uscourts.gov/wiki/index.php%3Ftitle=Main_Page +
, http://www.kentlaw.edu/7cr/ +
, http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl%3Fcourt=7th&navby=year&year=recent +
|
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageID
|
38799312
|
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageLength
|
11667
|
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageRevisionID
|
1081549133
|
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageWikiLink
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Substantial_similarity +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Copyright_law_of_the_United_States +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Judgment_notwithstanding_the_verdict +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Blue_Weaver +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:1984_in_United_States_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Landmark_case +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Albhy_Galuten +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/U.S._Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Seventh_Circuit +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Dick_Ashby +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/University_of_Illinois +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Maurice_Gibb +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Ch%C3%A2teau_d%27H%C3%A9rouville +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Bee_Gees +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Copyright_infringement +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Saturday_Night_Fever +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Affirmed_in_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Seventh_Circuit +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Popular_music +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Cross-examination +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Miscarriage_of_justice +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/How_Deep_Is_Your_Love_%28Bee_Gees_song%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Hazel_Crest%2C_Illinois +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Barry_Gibb +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Paramount_Pictures +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Bee_Gees_discography +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/United_States_District_Court_for_the_Northern_District_of_Illinois +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Robin_Gibb +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/George_N._Leighton +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Melody +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Lead_sheet +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/From_Me_to_You +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Classical_music +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Beatles +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Seventh_Circuit_cases +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Richard_Dickson_Cudahy +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Copyright_Law_of_the_United_States +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Bee_Gees +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_copyright_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Harlington_Wood%2C_Jr. +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Direct_examination +
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/arguedate
|
"1984-04-13"^^xsd:date
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/citations
|
17280.0
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/court
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Seventh_Circuit +
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/dateDecided
|
"1984-07-23"^^xsd:date
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/fullName
|
Ronald H. Selle v. Barry Gibb, Robin Gibb, and Maurice Gibb, A/K/A The Bee Gees, Brothers Gibb B.V., Phonodisc, Inc. and Paramount Pictures Corp.
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/judges
|
Wood and Cudahy, Circuit Judges, and Nichols, Senior Circuit Judge
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/keywords
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Substantial_similarity +
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/name
|
Selle v. Gibb
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/opinions
|
The doctrine of striking similarities is not enough in the absence of proof of access. Evidence of access must extend beyond mere speculation.
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:North_America_in_topic +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Copyright_law_by_country +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Reflist +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Infobox_court_case +
|
http://purl.org/dc/terms/subject
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Bee_Gees +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Seventh_Circuit_cases +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_copyright_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:1984_in_United_States_case_law +
|
http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selle_v._Gibb?oldid=1081549133&ns=0 +
|
http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/homepage
|
https://web.archive.org/web/20090512025011/http:/www.ca7.uscourts.gov/wiki/index.php%3Ftitle=Main_Page +
|
http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/isPrimaryTopicOf
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selle_v._Gibb +
|
owl:sameAs |
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Selle_v._Gibb +
, http://rdf.freebase.com/ns/m.0rph7xr +
, https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4urRN +
, http://yago-knowledge.org/resource/Selle_v._Gibb +
, http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q7448609 +
|
rdf:type |
http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Happening107283608 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Abstraction100002137 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Case107308889 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Event100029378 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/PsychologicalFeature100023100 +
|
rdfs:comment |
Selle v. Gibb, 741 F.2d 896 (7th Cir. 1984 … Selle v. Gibb, 741 F.2d 896 (7th Cir. 1984) was a landmark ruling on the doctrine of striking similarities. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit ruled that while copying must be proved by access and substantial similarity, where evidence of access does not exist, striking similarities may raise an inference of copying by showing that the work could not have been the result of independent creation, coincidence, or common source. Striking similarity alone is not enough to infer access. The similarity must preclude independent creation in order to infer access.pendent creation in order to infer access.
|
rdfs:label |
Selle v. Gibb
|