| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/abstract
|
Microsoft Corp. v. Shah was an Anticybersq … Microsoft Corp. v. Shah was an Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA) case heard before the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. Microsoft sued the defendants, Amish Shah and others, for, among other charges, contributory cybersquatting for encouraging others, through videos and software, to infringe on Microsoft's trademarks. The case was settled out of court in July 2011 after judge Ricardo S. Martinez denied Shah's motion for dismissal. Legal observers suggested that, if upheld, the case would prove notable for the court's expansionof the ACPA liability to include contributory cybersquatting.ty to include contributory cybersquatting.
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/thumbnail
|
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Washington-western.png?width=300 +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageExternalLink
|
https://archive.org/details/gov.uscourts.wawd.166997 +
, http://archive.recapthelaw.org/wawd/166997/ +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageID
|
37360884
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageLength
|
7634
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageRevisionID
|
1113043846
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageWikiLink
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Defendant +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Ricardo_S._Martinez +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Trademark_dilution +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Trademark +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Microsoft +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Trademark_infringement +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_trademark_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Anticybersquatting_Consumer_Protection_Act +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Domain_registrar +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Contributory_liability +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/United_States_District_Court_for_the_Northern_District_of_California +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Domain_Name_System +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Microsoft_v._MikeRoweSoft +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:2011_in_United_States_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Ford_Motor_Co._v._Greatdomains.com +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/GoDaddy +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Intellectual_property_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Tort +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Microsoft_litigation +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_Internet_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Domain_name +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Cybersquatting +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Legal_liability +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Tort_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/United_States_District_Court_for_the_Western_District_of_Washington +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/citations
|
https://archive.org/details/gov.uscourts.wawd.166997 +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/court
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/United_States_District_Court_for_the_Western_District_of_Washington +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/dateDecided
|
"2011-07-11"^^xsd:date
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/fullName
|
Microsoft Corporation v. Amish P. Shah, Jose A. Rivera, Digispace Solutions LLC, YMultimedia LLC, and DOES 1-50
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/holding
|
Motion to dismiss denied; case settled out of court
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/judge
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Ricardo_S._Martinez +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/name
|
Microsoft Corp. v. Shah et al.
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/transcripts
|
http://archive.recapthelaw.org/wawd/166997/ +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Infobox_United_States_District_Court_case +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Short_description +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Domain_parking +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Reflist +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Microsoft +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Citation_needed +
|
| http://purl.org/dc/terms/subject
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_Internet_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:2011_in_United_States_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_trademark_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Microsoft_litigation +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Intellectual_property_law +
|
| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Corp._v._Shah?oldid=1113043846&ns=0 +
|
| http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/depiction
|
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Washington-western.png +
|
| http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/isPrimaryTopicOf
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Corp._v._Shah +
|
| owl:sameAs |
http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q6840282 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Microsoft_Corp._v._Shah +
, https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4rqiM +
, http://rdf.freebase.com/ns/m.0nb3cxr +
|
| rdf:type |
http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Happening107283608 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Case107308889 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Abstraction100002137 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Event100029378 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/PsychologicalFeature100023100 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity +
|
| rdfs:comment |
Microsoft Corp. v. Shah was an Anticybersq … Microsoft Corp. v. Shah was an Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA) case heard before the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. Microsoft sued the defendants, Amish Shah and others, for, among other charges, contributory cybersquatting for encouraging others, through videos and software, to infringe on Microsoft's trademarks. The case was settled out of court in July 2011 after judge Ricardo S. Martinez denied Shah's motion for dismissal. Legal observers suggested that, if upheld, the case would prove notable for the court's expansionof the ACPA liability to include contributory cybersquatting.ty to include contributory cybersquatting.
|
| rdfs:label |
Microsoft Corp. v. Shah
|
