| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/abstract
|
Lux v. Haggin, 69 Cal. 255; 10 P. 674; (18 … Lux v. Haggin, 69 Cal. 255; 10 P. 674; (1886), is a historic case in the conflict between riparian and appropriative water rights. Decided by a vote of four to three in the Supreme Court of California, the ruling held that appropriative rights were secondary to riparian rights. rights were secondary to riparian rights.
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageID
|
35204151
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageLength
|
9897
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageRevisionID
|
1053598161
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageWikiLink
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Common_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Riparian_water_rights +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Robert_F._Morrison +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Buena_Vista_Slough +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Kern_River +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Appropriative_water_rights +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_water_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:1886_in_United_States_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Elisha_W._McKinstry +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:History_of_Kern_County%2C_California +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Kern_River +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Kern_County +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:California_state_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:1886_in_California +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/James_Ben_Ali_Haggin +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Erskine_M._Ross +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Water_in_California +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/associatejudges
|
Elisha W. McKinstry, Samuel B. McKee, John R. Sharpstein, James D. Thornton, Erskine M. Ross, Milton H. Myrick
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/chiefjudge
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Robert_F._Morrison +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/citations
|
; 10 P. 674
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/concurrence
|
McKee, Sharpstein, Thornton
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/decidedate
|
--04-26
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/decideyear
|
1886
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/dissent
|
Ross
, Myrick
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/fullname
|
Charles Lux et al., Appellants, v. James B. Haggin et al. The Kern River Land and Canal Company, Respondent
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/holding
|
Riparian water rights are superior to appropriative water rights. Appropriation of water for public use is permitted with just compensation.
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/joindissent
|
Morrison
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/litigants
|
Lux v. Haggin
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/majority
|
McKinstry
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Infobox_California_Supreme_Court_case +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Reflist +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Law_report +
|
| http://purl.org/dc/terms/subject
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Water_in_California +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:California_state_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:1886_in_United_States_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:1886_in_California +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Kern_River +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_water_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:History_of_Kern_County%2C_California +
|
| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lux_v._Haggin?oldid=1053598161&ns=0 +
|
| http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/isPrimaryTopicOf
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lux_v._Haggin +
|
| owl:sameAs |
http://rdf.freebase.com/ns/m.0jt5dpk +
, http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q6706181 +
, https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4qo91 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Lux_v._Haggin +
|
| rdf:type |
http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Case107308889 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/PsychologicalFeature100023100 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Abstraction100002137 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Happening107283608 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Event100029378 +
|
| rdfs:comment |
Lux v. Haggin, 69 Cal. 255; 10 P. 674; (18 … Lux v. Haggin, 69 Cal. 255; 10 P. 674; (1886), is a historic case in the conflict between riparian and appropriative water rights. Decided by a vote of four to three in the Supreme Court of California, the ruling held that appropriative rights were secondary to riparian rights. rights were secondary to riparian rights.
|
| rdfs:label |
Lux v. Haggin
|
