| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/abstract
|
在學術出版中，最小可出版單位（英語：Least publishable unit、缩 … 在學術出版中，最小可出版單位（英語：Least publishable unit、缩写LPU）是指可以通過期刊或會議的同儕審查，並最終得以出版的最小資訊量。本詞語常用於玩笑、諷刺、或貶低學者將其研究成果分散在數篇論文中以誇大發表數之行為。 發表研究成果是科學研究的一部分，其中發表數通常用於評估科學家的貢獻，尤是審查研究經費時。為了在這類審查中佔據優勢，一些科學家傾向於將研究成果切割成較小的「碎片」並分別寫成獨立的文章，以期最大化發表數。切到最細小之處，再切下去便無法通過審查（於是無法發表）的碎片便被稱為最小可出版單位。切到最細小之處，再切下去便無法通過審查（於是無法發表）的碎片便被稱為最小可出版單位。
, In academic publishing, the least publisha … In academic publishing, the least publishable unit (LPU), also smallest publishable unit (SPU), minimum publishable unit (MPU), loot, or publon, is the smallest measurable quantum of publication, the minimum amount of information that can be used to generate a publication in a peer-reviewed venue, such as a journal or a conference. (Maximum publishable unit and optimum publishable unit are also used.) The term is often used as a joking, ironic, or derogatory reference to the strategy of artificially inflating quantity of publications. Publication of the results of research is an essential part of science. The number of publications is often used to assess the work of a scientist and as a basis for distributing research funds. In order to achieve a high rank in such an assessment, there is a trend to split up research results into smaller parts that are published separately, thus inflating the number of publications. This process has been described as splitting the results into the smallest publishable units. "Salami publication", sometimes also referred to as "salami slicing", is a variant of the smallest-publishable-unit strategy. In salami publishing, data gathered by one research project is separately reported (wholly or in part) in multiple end publications. Salami publishing, apparently named by analogy with the thin slices made from a larger salami sausage, is generally considered questionable when not explicitly labeled, as it may lead to the same data being counted multiple times as apparently independent results in aggregate studies. When data gathered in one research project are partially reported as if a single study, a problem of statistical significance can arise. Scientists typically use a 5% threshold to determine whether a hypothesis is supported by the results of a research project. If multiple hypotheses are being tested on a single research project, 1 in 20 hypotheses will by chance be supported by the research. Partially reported research projects must use a more stringent threshold when testing for statistical significance but often do not do this. There is no consensus among academics about whether people should seek to make their publications least publishable units, and it has long been resisted by some journal editors. Particularly for people just getting started in academic publication, writing a few small articles provides a way of getting used to how the system of peer review and professional publication works, and it does indeed help to boost publication count. But publishing too many LPUs is thought not to impress peers when it comes time to seek promotion beyond the assistant professor (or equivalent) level. Also, LPUs may not always be the most efficient way to pass on knowledge, because they break up ideas into small pieces, sometimes forcing people to look up many cross-references. Multiple salami slices also occupy more journal pages than a single synthetic article that contains the same information. On the other hand, a small piece of information is easily digestible, and the reader may not need more information than what is in the LPU. more information than what is in the LPU.
, サラミ出版（サラミしゅっぱん、英語: Salami publication）は、一つ … サラミ出版（サラミしゅっぱん、英語: Salami publication）は、一つの研究として発表可能な成果を、多数の小さな研究に分割して、あるいは1本の論文で発表可能な内容を複数の論文に分割して出版する行為を指す表現。英語では「Salami slicing」ともいい、これを踏まえて日本語でも「サラミ・スライシング」「サラミ法」と称することがある。また、分割出版、ボローニャ出版とも呼ばれる。 サラミ出版は、業績を量的に膨らせる手法であるが、個々の論文の価値は下がり、文献数が増えても知識量が増えないことになる。このため、各学会や大学などが定める研究不正防止のためのガイドラインにおいては、不正行為とされたり、不正行為には当たらないが不適切な行為、好ましくない行為とされる。不正行為とされたり、不正行為には当たらないが不適切な行為、好ましくない行為とされる。
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageExternalLink
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch%3Fv=QjVsDAjNwDw +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageID
|
5077931
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageLength
|
5780
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageRevisionID
|
1067319365
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageWikiLink
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Academic_publishing +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Publish_or_perish +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Science +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Salami_slicing +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Publishing +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Publons +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/H-index +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Statistical_significance +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Impact_factor +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Scientometrics +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Peer_review +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Salami +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Academic_terminology +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Research +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Academic_careerism +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Publication_bias +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Academic_publishing +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Academic_publishing +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Short_description +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Dubious +
|
| http://purl.org/dc/terms/subject
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Academic_terminology +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Publishing +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Academic_publishing +
|
| http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/hypernym
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Quantum +
|
| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Least_publishable_unit?oldid=1067319365&ns=0 +
|
| http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/isPrimaryTopicOf
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Least_publishable_unit +
|
| owl:sameAs |
http://ja.dbpedia.org/resource/%E3%82%B5%E3%83%A9%E3%83%9F%E5%87%BA%E7%89%88 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Least_publishable_unit +
, http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q6510394 +
, http://rdf.freebase.com/ns/m.0d1pxd +
, http://zh.dbpedia.org/resource/%E6%9C%80%E5%B0%8F%E5%87%BA%E7%89%88%E5%96%AE%E4%BD%8D +
, https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4pmFj +
|
| rdfs:comment |
In academic publishing, the least publisha … In academic publishing, the least publishable unit (LPU), also smallest publishable unit (SPU), minimum publishable unit (MPU), loot, or publon, is the smallest measurable quantum of publication, the minimum amount of information that can be used to generate a publication in a peer-reviewed venue, such as a journal or a conference. (Maximum publishable unit and optimum publishable unit are also used.) The term is often used as a joking, ironic, or derogatory reference to the strategy of artificially inflating quantity of publications.cially inflating quantity of publications.
, サラミ出版（サラミしゅっぱん、英語: Salami publication）は、一つ … サラミ出版（サラミしゅっぱん、英語: Salami publication）は、一つの研究として発表可能な成果を、多数の小さな研究に分割して、あるいは1本の論文で発表可能な内容を複数の論文に分割して出版する行為を指す表現。英語では「Salami slicing」ともいい、これを踏まえて日本語でも「サラミ・スライシング」「サラミ法」と称することがある。また、分割出版、ボローニャ出版とも呼ばれる。 サラミ出版は、業績を量的に膨らせる手法であるが、個々の論文の価値は下がり、文献数が増えても知識量が増えないことになる。このため、各学会や大学などが定める研究不正防止のためのガイドラインにおいては、不正行為とされたり、不正行為には当たらないが不適切な行為、好ましくない行為とされる。不正行為とされたり、不正行為には当たらないが不適切な行為、好ましくない行為とされる。
, 在學術出版中，最小可出版單位（英語：Least publishable unit、缩 … 在學術出版中，最小可出版單位（英語：Least publishable unit、缩写LPU）是指可以通過期刊或會議的同儕審查，並最終得以出版的最小資訊量。本詞語常用於玩笑、諷刺、或貶低學者將其研究成果分散在數篇論文中以誇大發表數之行為。 發表研究成果是科學研究的一部分，其中發表數通常用於評估科學家的貢獻，尤是審查研究經費時。為了在這類審查中佔據優勢，一些科學家傾向於將研究成果切割成較小的「碎片」並分別寫成獨立的文章，以期最大化發表數。切到最細小之處，再切下去便無法通過審查（於是無法發表）的碎片便被稱為最小可出版單位。切到最細小之處，再切下去便無法通過審查（於是無法發表）的碎片便被稱為最小可出版單位。
|
| rdfs:label |
Least publishable unit
, 最小出版單位
, サラミ出版
|
