| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/abstract
|
Kalem Co. v. Harper Bros., 222 U.S. 55 (19 … Kalem Co. v. Harper Bros., 222 U.S. 55 (1911), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held producing a motion picture based on a dramatic work can be copyright infringement. The producer of the motion picture is liable even they are not the exhibitor. This does not extend to a restriction of the dramatic work's ideas; it is a recognition of the author's monopoly powers granted by Congress. The case involved a 1907 film adaptation of the 1880 novel Ben-Hur: A Tale of the Christ by Lew Wallace.-Hur: A Tale of the Christ by Lew Wallace.
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageExternalLink
|
https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/222/55.html +
, https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/97466/kalem-co-v-harper-brothers/ +
, http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep222/usrep222055/usrep222055.pdf +
, https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/222/55 +
, https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/222/55/case.html +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageID
|
58183138
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageLength
|
6708
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageRevisionID
|
1083180075
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageWikiLink
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Emile_Henry_Lacombe +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:1911_in_United_States_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_White_Court +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Second_Circuit +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Ben_Hur_%281907_film%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Henry_Galbraith_Ward +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Motion_Picture_Patents_Company +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Klaw_and_Erlanger +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Ben-Hur_%28play%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Uncle_Tom%27s_Cabin +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Lew_Wallace +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Oliver_Wendell_Holmes_Jr. +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_copyright_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Ben-Hur:_A_Tale_of_the_Christ +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Union_%28American_Civil_War%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Kalem_Company +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Cinema_of_the_United_States +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/L._Ed. +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Harper_%28publisher%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Library_of_Congress +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/arguedatea
|
--10-31
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/arguedateb
|
--11-01
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/argueyear
|
1911
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/case
|
Kalem Co. v. Harper Bros.,
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/cornell
|
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/222/55 +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/courtlistener
|
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/97466/kalem-co-v-harper-brothers/ +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/decidedate
|
--11-13
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/decideyear
|
1911
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/findlaw
|
https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/222/55.html +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/fullname
|
Kalem Co. v. Harper Bros.
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/holding
|
Producing a motion picture based on a dram … Producing a motion picture based on a dramatic work can be copyright infringement. The producer of the motion picture is liable even they are not the exhibitor. This does not extend to a restriction of the dramatic work's ideas; it is a recognition of the author's monopoly powers granted by Congress.hor's monopoly powers granted by Congress.
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/joinmajority
|
unanimous
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/justia
|
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/222/55/case.html +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/litigants
|
Kalem Co. v. Harper Bros.
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/loc
|
http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep222/usrep222055/usrep222055.pdf +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/majority
|
Holmes Jr.
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/parallelcitations
|
32
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/uspage
|
55
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/usvol
|
222
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Infobox_SCOTUS_case +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Ussc +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Inflation +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Caselaw_source +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:USArticleI +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Reflist +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:SCOTUS-stub +
|
| http://purl.org/dc/terms/subject
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:1911_in_United_States_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_White_Court +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_copyright_case_law +
|
| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalem_Co._v._Harper_Bros.?oldid=1083180075&ns=0 +
|
| http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/isPrimaryTopicOf
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalem_Co._v._Harper_Bros. +
|
| http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name
|
Kalem Co. v. Harper Bros.
|
| owl:sameAs |
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Kalem_Co._v._Harper_Bros. +
, http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q56278957 +
, https://global.dbpedia.org/id/8BgTm +
|
| rdf:type |
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/UnitOfWork +
, http://dbpedia.org/ontology/LegalCase +
, http://dbpedia.org/ontology/Case +
, http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q2334719 +
, http://dbpedia.org/ontology/SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase +
|
| rdfs:comment |
Kalem Co. v. Harper Bros., 222 U.S. 55 (19 … Kalem Co. v. Harper Bros., 222 U.S. 55 (1911), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held producing a motion picture based on a dramatic work can be copyright infringement. The producer of the motion picture is liable even they are not the exhibitor. This does not extend to a restriction of the dramatic work's ideas; it is a recognition of the author's monopoly powers granted by Congress. The case involved a 1907 film adaptation of the 1880 novel Ben-Hur: A Tale of the Christ by Lew Wallace.-Hur: A Tale of the Christ by Lew Wallace.
|
| rdfs:label |
Kalem Co. v. Harper Bros.
|
