http://dbpedia.org/ontology/abstract
|
مغالطة التجاهل المنيع، هي مغالطة استنتاجية … مغالطة التجاهل المنيع، هي مغالطة استنتاجية يتم تداولها عندما يرفض الشخص المعني تصديق الحجّة، ويتجاهل كل الأدلّة المقدّمة. هذا الأمر ليس تكتيكاً خاطئاً في النقاش بقدر ما هو رفض للنقاش بكل ما تعنيه الكلمة من معنى، تستند هذه المغالطة إلى تقديم التأكيدات بدون أي اعتبار للاعتراضات أو رفض الاعتراضات واعتبارها مجرد تخمينات أو أعذار أو حتى القول بأن هذه الاعتراضات لا تثبت أي شيء؛ كل ذلك بدون إثبات فعليّاً مدى توافق الاعتراض مع العبارات المطروحة.ً مدى توافق الاعتراض مع العبارات المطروحة.
, The invincible ignorance fallacy, also kno … The invincible ignorance fallacy, also known as argument by pigheadedness, is a deductive fallacy of circularity where the person in question simply refuses to believe the argument, ignoring any evidence given. It is not so much a fallacious tactic in argument as it is a refusal to argue in the proper sense of the word. The method used in this fallacy is either to make assertions with no consideration of objections or to simply dismiss objections by calling them excuses, conjecture, etc. or saying that they are proof of nothing, all without actually demonstrating how the objection fit these terms. It is similar to the ad lapidem fallacy, in which the person rejects all the evidence and logic presented, without providing any evidence or logic that could lead to a different conclusion.that could lead to a different conclusion.
, La fallacia dell'ignoranza invincibile è u … La fallacia dell'ignoranza invincibile è una fallacia di ragionamento circolare per cui la persona in oggetto rifiuta semplicemente di credere all'argomento proposto, ignorando ogni evidenza. Non si tratta tanto di una tattica d'argomentazione fallace, poiché è un rifiuto di discutere nel vero senso della parola, facendo, d'altra parte, affermazioni senza alcuna considerazione delle obiezioni mosse.cuna considerazione delle obiezioni mosse.
, 掩耳盜鈴謬誤,又稱無敵無知謬誤(invincible ignorance fallacy),是指某人完全無視對他的觀點的反對證據,而斷言沒有證據能反對他的觀點。
|
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageExternalLink
|
http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php%3Fprogram=CSC%2BResponses&command=view&id=1256 +
, http://www.ewtn.com/library/ENCYC/P9QUANTO.HTM +
, http://www.philosophicalsociety.com/Logical%20Fallacies.htm +
|
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageID
|
22097838
|
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageLength
|
3659
|
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageRevisionID
|
1090126722
|
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageWikiLink
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Pope_Pius_IX +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Papal_allocution +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Encyclical +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Catholic_theology +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Argument +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Aquinas +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Relevance_fallacies +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Vincible_ignorance +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Origen +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Invincible_ignorance_%28Catholic_theology%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Deductive_fallacy +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Circular_reasoning +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Summa_Theologica +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Argumentum_ad_lapidem +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Metaphors +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Empirical_evidence +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/A_priori_and_a_posteriori +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Future_probation +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Christianity +
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Logic-stub +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Short_description +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Confused +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Fallacies +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Reflist +
|
http://purl.org/dc/terms/subject
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Relevance_fallacies +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Metaphors +
|
http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/hypernym
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Fallacy +
|
http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invincible_ignorance_fallacy?oldid=1090126722&ns=0 +
|
http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/isPrimaryTopicOf
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invincible_ignorance_fallacy +
|
owl:differentFrom |
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Vincible_ignorance +
|
owl:sameAs |
http://ar.dbpedia.org/resource/%D9%85%D8%BA%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B7%D8%A9_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AA%D8%AC%D8%A7%D9%87%D9%84_%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%86%D9%8A%D8%B9 +
, http://it.dbpedia.org/resource/Fallacia_dell%27ignoranza_invincibile +
, http://yago-knowledge.org/resource/Invincible_ignorance_fallacy +
, http://zh.dbpedia.org/resource/%E6%8E%A9%E8%80%B3%E7%9B%9C%E9%88%B4%E8%AC%AC%E8%AA%A4 +
, http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q2086094 +
, http://he.dbpedia.org/resource/%D7%91%D7%95%D7%A8%D7%95%D7%AA_%D7%91%D7%9C%D7%AA%D7%99-%D7%9E%D7%A0%D7%95%D7%A6%D7%97%D7%AA +
, http://rdf.freebase.com/ns/m.05p28ds +
, https://global.dbpedia.org/id/yqVF +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Invincible_ignorance_fallacy +
|
rdf:type |
http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Misconception105893653 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/WikicatRelevanceFallacies +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Fallacy105893916 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Abstraction100002137 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Trope107105475 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Metaphor107106800 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/ExpressiveStyle107066659 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Communication100033020 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Idea105833840 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Content105809192 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/LogicalFallacy105894143 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/WikicatLogicalFallacies +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/RhetoricalDevice107098193 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/WikicatMetaphors +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Cognition100023271 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/PsychologicalFeature100023100 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Device107068844 +
|
rdfs:comment |
مغالطة التجاهل المنيع، هي مغالطة استنتاجية … مغالطة التجاهل المنيع، هي مغالطة استنتاجية يتم تداولها عندما يرفض الشخص المعني تصديق الحجّة، ويتجاهل كل الأدلّة المقدّمة. هذا الأمر ليس تكتيكاً خاطئاً في النقاش بقدر ما هو رفض للنقاش بكل ما تعنيه الكلمة من معنى، تستند هذه المغالطة إلى تقديم التأكيدات بدون أي اعتبار للاعتراضات أو رفض الاعتراضات واعتبارها مجرد تخمينات أو أعذار أو حتى القول بأن هذه الاعتراضات لا تثبت أي شيء؛ كل ذلك بدون إثبات فعليّاً مدى توافق الاعتراض مع العبارات المطروحة.ً مدى توافق الاعتراض مع العبارات المطروحة.
, The invincible ignorance fallacy, also kno … The invincible ignorance fallacy, also known as argument by pigheadedness, is a deductive fallacy of circularity where the person in question simply refuses to believe the argument, ignoring any evidence given. It is not so much a fallacious tactic in argument as it is a refusal to argue in the proper sense of the word. The method used in this fallacy is either to make assertions with no consideration of objections or to simply dismiss objections by calling them excuses, conjecture, etc. or saying that they are proof of nothing, all without actually demonstrating how the objection fit these terms. It is similar to the ad lapidem fallacy, in which the person rejects all the evidence and logic presented, without providing any evidence or logic that could lead to a different conclusion.that could lead to a different conclusion.
, 掩耳盜鈴謬誤,又稱無敵無知謬誤(invincible ignorance fallacy),是指某人完全無視對他的觀點的反對證據,而斷言沒有證據能反對他的觀點。
, La fallacia dell'ignoranza invincibile è u … La fallacia dell'ignoranza invincibile è una fallacia di ragionamento circolare per cui la persona in oggetto rifiuta semplicemente di credere all'argomento proposto, ignorando ogni evidenza. Non si tratta tanto di una tattica d'argomentazione fallace, poiché è un rifiuto di discutere nel vero senso della parola, facendo, d'altra parte, affermazioni senza alcuna considerazione delle obiezioni mosse.cuna considerazione delle obiezioni mosse.
|
rdfs:label |
مغالطة التجاهل المنيع
, 掩耳盜鈴謬誤
, Fallacia dell'ignoranza invincibile
, Invincible ignorance fallacy
|