| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/abstract
|
The impact of microcredit is a subject of … The impact of microcredit is a subject of much controversy. Proponents state that it reduces poverty through higher employment and higher incomes. This is expected to lead to improved nutrition and improved education of the borrowers' children. Some argue that microcredit empowers women. In the US and Canada, it is argued that microcredit helps recipients to graduate from welfare programs. Critics say that microcredit has not increased incomes, but has driven poor households into a debt trap, in some cases even leading to suicide. They add that the money from loans is often used for durable consumer goods or consumption instead of being used for productive investments, that it fails to empower women, and that it has not improved health or education. The available evidence indicates that in many cases microcredit has facilitated the creation and the growth of businesses. It has often generated self-employment, but it has not necessarily increased incomes after interest payments. In some cases it has driven borrowers into debt traps. In addition, it can produce unintended rent-seeking entrepreneurship.There is no evidence that microcredit has empowered women. In short, microcredit has achieved much less than what its proponents said it would achieve, but its negative impacts have not been as drastic as some critics have argued. Microcredit is just one factor influencing the success of a small businesses, whose success is influenced to a much larger extent by how much an economy or a particular market grows. A critical review of 58 papers covering experiences in 18 countries concluded "there is no good evidence for the beneficent impact of microfinance on the well-being of poor people" and that "the greatest impacts are reported by studies with the weakest designs". The attempt to objectively evaluate the impact of microcredit on a global or a local scale is marred by numerous methodological challenges. There are only few rigorous evaluations of microcredit, and much of the literature on the impact of microcredit is based in anecdotal reports or case studies that are not representative. Even among the rigorous evaluations many "suffer from weak methodologies and inadequate data", according to a systematic literature review of the impact of microcredit conducted in 2011 by a group of researchers on behalf of UKAid. A 2008 review of over 100 articles on microcredit found that only 6 used enough quantitative data to be representative, and none employed rigorous methods such as randomized control trials. Rigorous impact evaluations using control and treatment groups are difficult to undertake today, because microcredit is so common in developing countries today that few locations remain where such a research setting can still be applied. Further complicating impact studies is the often highly politicized context of poverty alleviation initiatives.ontext of poverty alleviation initiatives.
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/thumbnail
|
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Rwandan_farm_cooperative_goats.jpg?width=300 +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageID
|
37968797
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageLength
|
26164
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageRevisionID
|
1120098354
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageWikiLink
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/File:Rwandan_farm_cooperative_goats.jpg +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Microfinance +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Anu_Muhammad +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Andhra_Pradesh +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Grameen_Bank +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Compartamos_Banco +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Nicolas_Kristof +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Domestic_violence +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Poverty_Action_Lab +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Jahangirnagar_University +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Esther_Duflo +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Innovations_for_Poverty_Action +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Muhammad_Yunus +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/DFID +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Abhijit_Banerjee +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Microcredit +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Monga_%28Bangladesh%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/New_York_University +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Marxist +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Investment +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Yale_University +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Kurigram_District +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Milford_Bateman +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Cyclone_Sidr +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Nicholas_Kristof +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Dowry +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Hyderabad%2C_India +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/File:An_ESAF_%27Sangam%27_Meeting_in_progress_in_Kerala.jpg +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Randomized_control_trial +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Consumer_good +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Debt_trap +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/M._Saifur_Rahman +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Dean_Karlan +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/M.I.T. +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Reflist +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Short_description +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Which +
|
| http://purl.org/dc/terms/subject
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Microfinance +
|
| http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/hypernym
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Subject +
|
| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impact_of_microcredit?oldid=1120098354&ns=0 +
|
| http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/depiction
|
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/An_ESAF_%27Sangam%27_Meeting_in_progress_in_Kerala.jpg +
, http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Rwandan_farm_cooperative_goats.jpg +
|
| http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/isPrimaryTopicOf
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impact_of_microcredit +
|
| owl:sameAs |
http://rdf.freebase.com/ns/m.0p8ww3x +
, https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4nGt6 +
, http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q6005919 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Impact_of_microcredit +
|
| rdf:type |
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/AdministrativeRegion +
|
| rdfs:comment |
The impact of microcredit is a subject of … The impact of microcredit is a subject of much controversy. Proponents state that it reduces poverty through higher employment and higher incomes. This is expected to lead to improved nutrition and improved education of the borrowers' children. Some argue that microcredit empowers women. In the US and Canada, it is argued that microcredit helps recipients to graduate from welfare programs. Critics say that microcredit has not increased incomes, but has driven poor households into a debt trap, in some cases even leading to suicide. They add that the money from loans is often used for durable consumer goods or consumption instead of being used for productive investments, that it fails to empower women, and that it has not improved health or education.t it has not improved health or education.
|
| rdfs:label |
Impact of microcredit
|
