| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/abstract
|
Edmonds v Lawson [2000] EWCA Civ 69 is a U … Edmonds v Lawson [2000] EWCA Civ 69 is a UK labour law case regarding the National Minimum Wage Act 1998 and who is/is not included; it also considered whether a pupil barrister provides consideration to his/her master and/or chambers and whether that relationship demonstrated adequate intention. It held that pupil barristers are not included as either "apprentices" (as was held at first instance) or "workers" for the purposes of the Act but do provide adequate consideration and intention to found a contract with their chambers.n to found a contract with their chambers.
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageExternalLink
|
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2000/69.html +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageID
|
30949009
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageLength
|
3984
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageRevisionID
|
1082970787
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageWikiLink
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Court_of_Appeal_%28England_and_Wales%29_cases +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:2000_in_British_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:2000_in_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_Kingdom_wages_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/The_Parish_of_St_Pancras_Middlesex_v_The_Parish_of_Clapham%2C_Surrey +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Worker +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Lord_Bingham +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_Kingdom_labour_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Minimum_wage +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/UK_labour_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/National_Minimum_Wage_Act_1998 +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/citations
|
[2000] EWCA Civ 69, [2000] QB 501, [2000] ICR 567, [2000] IRLR 391
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/court
|
Court of Appeal
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/dateDecided
|
"2000-03-10"^^xsd:date
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/keywords
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Minimum_wage +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Worker +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/name
|
Edmonds v Lawson
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Clist_worker_scope +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:One_source +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Cquote +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Clist_wage +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Infobox_Court_Case +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Reflist +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:UK_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:More_citations_needed +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Use_dmy_dates +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Multiple_issues +
|
| http://purl.org/dc/terms/subject
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_Kingdom_wages_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Court_of_Appeal_%28England_and_Wales%29_cases +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_Kingdom_labour_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:2000_in_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:2000_in_British_law +
|
| http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/hypernym
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Case +
|
| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edmonds_v_Lawson?oldid=1082970787&ns=0 +
|
| http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/isPrimaryTopicOf
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edmonds_v_Lawson +
|
| owl:sameAs |
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Edmonds_v_Lawson +
, http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q5338958 +
, http://rdf.freebase.com/ns/m.0gg5pwr +
, https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4iTsz +
|
| rdf:type |
http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Happening107283608 +
, http://dbpedia.org/ontology/SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/WikicatUnitedKingdomWagesCases +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Abstraction100002137 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Event100029378 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Case107308889 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/PsychologicalFeature100023100 +
|
| rdfs:comment |
Edmonds v Lawson [2000] EWCA Civ 69 is a U … Edmonds v Lawson [2000] EWCA Civ 69 is a UK labour law case regarding the National Minimum Wage Act 1998 and who is/is not included; it also considered whether a pupil barrister provides consideration to his/her master and/or chambers and whether that relationship demonstrated adequate intention. It held that pupil barristers are not included as either "apprentices" (as was held at first instance) or "workers" for the purposes of the Act but do provide adequate consideration and intention to found a contract with their chambers.n to found a contract with their chambers.
|
| rdfs:label |
Edmonds v Lawson
|
