| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/abstract
|
Daimler AG v. Bauman, 571 U.S. 117 (2014), … Daimler AG v. Bauman, 571 U.S. 117 (2014), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court answered whether an American court may exercise jurisdiction over a foreign company based on the fact that a subsidiary of the company acts on its behalf in the jurisdictional state. The court held that an American company cannot be sued for conduct occurring outside the United States and American courts do not have jurisdiction of such a claim. do not have jurisdiction of such a claim.
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageExternalLink
|
https://www.oyez.org/cases/2010-2019/2013/2013_11_965 +
, https://www.oyez.org/cases/2013/11-965 +
, http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/daimlerchrysler-ag-v-bauman/ +
, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=1929137067016164680 +
, https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/13pdf/11-965_1qm2.pdf +
, https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/571/11-965/ +
, https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-965 +
, http://www.vanderbiltlawreview.org/enbanc/roundtable/daimlerchrysler-ag-v-bauman/ +
, https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20090828100 +
, https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20110518142 +
, https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20111109136 +
, https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2649076/daimler-ag-v-bauman/ +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageID
|
43453753
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageLength
|
15420
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageRevisionID
|
1107630227
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageWikiLink
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Sonia_Sotomayor +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Jurisdiction +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Stephen_Reinhardt +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Stuttgart%2C_Germany +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Dirty_War +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/En_banc +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Law_of_agency +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/United_States_District_Court_for_the_Northern_District_of_California +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Gonz%C3%A1lez_Cat%C3%A1n +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Christian_Tomuschat +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Torture_Victim_Protection_Act +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Solicitor_General +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Certiorari +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Linda_Greenhouse +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Personal_jurisdiction +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_personal_jurisdiction_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/BNSF_Railway_Co._v._Tyrrell +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/DaimlerChrysler +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Mercedes-Benz_Group +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Diarmuid_O%27Scannlain +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Ronald_M._Whyte +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Bristol-Myers_Squibb_Co._v._Superior_Court +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/In_personam +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Dorothy_Wright_Nelson +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/U.S._LEXIS +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:2014_in_United_States_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Alien_Tort_Statute +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Edwin_Kneedler +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/International_Shoe_Co._v._Washington +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/L._Ed._2d +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/F.3d +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Due_process +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Aktiengesellschaft +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Pennoyer_v._Neff +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Goodyear_Dunlop_Tires_Operations%2C_S.A._v._Brown +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Mary_M._Schroeder +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Torture_Victim_Protection_Act_of_1991 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Amnesty_International +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Mercedes-Benz +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/arguedate
|
--10-15
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/argueyear
|
2013
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/case
|
Daimler AG v. Bauman,
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/concurrence
|
Sotomayor
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/cornell
|
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-965 +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/courtlistener
|
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2649076/daimler-ag-v-bauman/ +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/decidedate
|
--01-14
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/decideyear
|
2014
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/docket
|
11
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/fullname
|
DaimlerChrysler AG, Petitioner v. Barbara Bauman, et al.
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/googlescholar
|
https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=1929137067016164680 +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/holding
|
Daimler cannot be sued in California for injuries allegedly caused by conduct of its Argentinian subsidiary when that conduct took place entirely outside of the United States.
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/joinmajority
|
Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Breyer, Alito, Kagan
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/justia
|
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/571/11-965/ +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/lawsapplied
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Torture_Victim_Protection_Act_of_1991 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Alien_Tort_Statute +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/litigants
|
Daimler AG v. Bauman
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/majority
|
Ginsburg
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/opinionannouncement
|
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/13pdf/11-965_1qm2.pdf +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/oralargument
|
https://www.oyez.org/cases/2010-2019/2013/2013_11_965 +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/otherSource
|
Supreme Court
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/otherUrl
|
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/13pdf/11-965_1qm2.pdf +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/oyez
|
https://www.oyez.org/cases/2013/11-965 +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/parallelcitations
|
172800.0
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/prior
|
25920.0
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/uspage
|
117
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/usvol
|
571
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Reflist +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Use_mdy_dates +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Ussc +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Infobox_SCOTUS_case +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Caselaw_source +
|
| http://purl.org/dc/terms/subject
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:2014_in_United_States_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Mercedes-Benz_Group +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_personal_jurisdiction_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court +
|
| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daimler_AG_v._Bauman?oldid=1107630227&ns=0 +
|
| http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/isPrimaryTopicOf
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daimler_AG_v._Bauman +
|
| http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name
|
DaimlerChrysler AG, Petitioner v. Barbara Bauman, et al.
|
| owl:sameAs |
http://rdf.freebase.com/ns/m.011jjf7m +
, https://global.dbpedia.org/id/kzrx +
, http://yago-knowledge.org/resource/Daimler_AG_v._Bauman +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Daimler_AG_v._Bauman +
, http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q18148317 +
|
| rdf:type |
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase +
, http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q2334719 +
, http://dbpedia.org/ontology/UnitOfWork +
, http://dbpedia.org/ontology/Case +
, http://dbpedia.org/ontology/LegalCase +
|
| rdfs:comment |
Daimler AG v. Bauman, 571 U.S. 117 (2014), … Daimler AG v. Bauman, 571 U.S. 117 (2014), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court answered whether an American court may exercise jurisdiction over a foreign company based on the fact that a subsidiary of the company acts on its behalf in the jurisdictional state. The court held that an American company cannot be sued for conduct occurring outside the United States and American courts do not have jurisdiction of such a claim. do not have jurisdiction of such a claim.
|
| rdfs:label |
Daimler AG v. Bauman
|
