| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/abstract
|
Canadian Pacific Railway Co. v Notre Dame … Canadian Pacific Railway Co. v Notre Dame de Bonsecours is a Canadian constitutional law decision, dealing with the powers of the provinces under the Constitution Act, 1867 (formerly the British North America Act, 1867). The point in issue was whether the Canadian Pacific Railway Company, a federally regulated railway, was required to comply with an order issued by a municipality under provincial law. The municipal order required the CPR Co. to clean a ditch beside its rail line, which had become blocked and flooded neighbouring land, under penalty of $20 per day until the ditch was cleared. The case arose in the province of Quebec and was appealed to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in Britain, at that time the highest court of appeal for the British Empire. The Judicial Committee held that the provincial law applied to the railway provided it did not regulate the structure or operation of the railway. The case is a foundational case for the scope of provincial legislation over federally regulated works and undertakings, and continues to be cited regularly by the Supreme Court of Canada. It has particular significance in environmental law cases.r significance in environmental law cases.
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/thumbnail
|
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Fassett_QC.jpg?width=300 +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageExternalLink
|
http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKPC/1899/1899_22.html +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageID
|
60969466
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageLength
|
12932
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageRevisionID
|
1089269108
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageWikiLink
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Types_of_municipalities_in_Quebec +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Canadian_federalism_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Section_92%2813%29_of_the_Constitution_Act%2C_1867 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Constitution_Act%2C_1867 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Richard_Haldane%2C_1st_Viscount_Haldane +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Outaouais +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Transport_in_Outaouais +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Michael_Morris%2C_Baron_Morris +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Judicial_Committee_of_the_Privy_Council_cases_on_appeal_from_Canada +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Hardinge_Giffard%2C_1st_Earl_of_Halsbury +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Quebec +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Canadian_constitutional_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Edward_Blake +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Supreme_Court_of_Canada +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Fassett%2C_Quebec +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Canadian_constitutional_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Horace_Davey%2C_Baron_Davey +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Edward_Macnaghten%2C_Baron_Macnaghten +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Judicial_Committee_of_the_Privy_Council +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Canadian_Pacific_Railway +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:1899_in_Canadian_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Gerald_Hohler +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Quebec%2C_Montreal%2C_Ottawa_and_Occidental_Railway +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/William_Watson%2C_Baron_Watson +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Quebec_Superior_Court +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Railway_litigation_in_1899 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Alexander_Shand%2C_1st_Baron_Shand +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/File:Maple_Leaf_%28from_roundel%29.svg +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/British_Empire +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Quebec_Court_of_Appeal +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Canadian_Pacific_Railway_Company +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Arthur_Hobhouse%2C_1st_Baron_Hobhouse +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Section_92%2810%29_of_the_Constitution_Act%2C_1867 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Notre-Dame-de-Bonsecours%2C_Quebec +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Court_costs +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/appealedFrom
|
Cie de Chemin de Fer Canadien du Pacifique v Notre-Dame-de-Bonsecours , 1897 CarswellQue 80, 7 Que. QB 121 Quebec Court of Queen's Bench 20x20px
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/caption
|
The railway through Notre-Dame-de-Bonsecours
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/citations
|
http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKPC/1899/1899_22.html +
, [1899] AC 367
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/court
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Judicial_Committee_of_the_Privy_Council +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/dateDecided
|
"1899-03-24"^^xsd:date
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/decisionBy
|
Lord Watson
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/fullName
|
Canadian Pacific Railway Company v Corporation of the Parish of Notre Dame de Bonsecours
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/judges
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Arthur_Hobhouse%2C_1st_Baron_Hobhouse +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/William_Watson%2C_Baron_Watson +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Horace_Davey%2C_Baron_Davey +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Alexander_Shand%2C_1st_Baron_Shand +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Hardinge_Giffard%2C_1st_Earl_of_Halsbury +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Edward_Macnaghten%2C_Baron_Macnaghten +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Michael_Morris%2C_Baron_Morris +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/keywords
|
Constitutional division of powers; municipal law; federally regulated works and undertakings
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/name
|
Canadian Pacific Railway Company v Notre Dame de Bonsecours
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/numberOfJudges
|
7
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/opinions
|
Provincial laws apply to federally regulated railways, provided the laws do not regulate the construction and management of the railway
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Short_description +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Use_Canadian_English +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Infobox_court_case +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Use_mdy +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Reflist +
|
| http://purl.org/dc/terms/subject
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Canadian_constitutional_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Railway_litigation_in_1899 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:1899_in_Canadian_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Canadian_federalism_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Canadian_Pacific_Railway +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Transport_in_Outaouais +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Judicial_Committee_of_the_Privy_Council_cases_on_appeal_from_Canada +
|
| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_Pacific_Railway_Co._v_Notre_Dame_de_Bonsecours?oldid=1089269108&ns=0 +
|
| http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/depiction
|
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Fassett_QC.jpg +
, http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Maple_Leaf_%28from_roundel%29.svg +
|
| http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/isPrimaryTopicOf
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_Pacific_Railway_Co._v_Notre_Dame_de_Bonsecours +
|
| owl:sameAs |
https://global.dbpedia.org/id/9kfED +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Canadian_Pacific_Railway_Co._v_Notre_Dame_de_Bonsecours +
, http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q65044149 +
|
| rdfs:comment |
Canadian Pacific Railway Co. v Notre Dame … Canadian Pacific Railway Co. v Notre Dame de Bonsecours is a Canadian constitutional law decision, dealing with the powers of the provinces under the Constitution Act, 1867 (formerly the British North America Act, 1867). The point in issue was whether the Canadian Pacific Railway Company, a federally regulated railway, was required to comply with an order issued by a municipality under provincial law. The municipal order required the CPR Co. to clean a ditch beside its rail line, which had become blocked and flooded neighbouring land, under penalty of $20 per day until the ditch was cleared.f $20 per day until the ditch was cleared.
|
| rdfs:label |
Canadian Pacific Railway Co. v Notre Dame de Bonsecours
|
