| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/abstract
|
The Biscuit Fire publication controversy w … The Biscuit Fire publication controversy was an academic and political controversy in the United States in January 2006 about publication of an academic paper titled Post-wildfire logging hinders regeneration and increases fire risk. The U.S Forest Service and a group of professors, including six at the Oregon State University College of Forestry, wrote a letter to the prestigious scientific journal Science requesting that publication of a short forestry paper written by an OSU Forestry graduate student and others be delayed until the authors could respond to it, arguing the article was "short on qualifiers and context". The group requested alternatively that Science publish a sidebar illustrating their concerns alongside the paper. Science refused, and the paper, which had already undergone peer review and been approved for publication, appeared in the January 20, 2006 issue. The paper had been published in the online edition of Science before the letter was written. of Science before the letter was written.
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageExternalLink
|
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/311/5759/352 +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageID
|
3960453
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageLength
|
8462
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageRevisionID
|
1074048658
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageWikiLink
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Science_%28journal%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:January_2006_events_in_the_United_States +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Logging +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/United_States_Forest_Service +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Forestry +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:2006_controversies_in_the_United_States +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Conifer +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Education_controversies_in_the_United_States +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Donald_Kennedy +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Forestry_in_the_United_States +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Works_originally_published_in_Science_%28journal%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Wildfire +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Academic_freedom +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Brian_Baird +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Peer_review +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/United_States +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Wildfires_in_Oregon +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:2006_works +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Biscuit_Fire +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Salvage_logging +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/The_Oregonian +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Timber +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Academic_journal_articles +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/George_W._Bush_administration +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Oregon_State_University +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:2006_in_Oregon +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Reflist +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:More_citations_needed +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:OSUtemplate +
|
| http://purl.org/dc/terms/subject
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Wildfires_in_Oregon +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Works_originally_published_in_Science_%28journal%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Forestry_in_the_United_States +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:2006_controversies_in_the_United_States +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Education_controversies_in_the_United_States +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:2006_works +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:January_2006_events_in_the_United_States +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:2006_in_Oregon +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Academic_journal_articles +
|
| http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/hypernym
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Controversy +
|
| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biscuit_Fire_publication_controversy?oldid=1074048658&ns=0 +
|
| http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/isPrimaryTopicOf
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biscuit_Fire_publication_controversy +
|
| owl:sameAs |
https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4YaCd +
, http://rdf.freebase.com/ns/m.0b8sjn +
, http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q4917266 +
, http://yago-knowledge.org/resource/Biscuit_Fire_publication_controversy +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Biscuit_Fire_publication_controversy +
|
| rdf:type |
http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Wildfire107304753 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Event100029378 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Calamity107314838 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/WikicatAcademicScandals +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Wikicat2006DisastersInTheUnitedStates +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Fire107302836 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/WikicatWildfiresInOregon +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Happening107283608 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Trouble107289014 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Misfortune107304852 +
, http://dbpedia.org/ontology/Food +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Report107217924 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Gossip107223170 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Abstraction100002137 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Act100030358 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/PsychologicalFeature100023100 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Wikicat2002Wildfires +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Wikicat2006Wildfires +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Informing107212190 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Scandal107223811 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/SpeechAct107160883 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Conflagration107303697 +
|
| rdfs:comment |
The Biscuit Fire publication controversy w … The Biscuit Fire publication controversy was an academic and political controversy in the United States in January 2006 about publication of an academic paper titled Post-wildfire logging hinders regeneration and increases fire risk. The U.S Forest Service and a group of professors, including six at the Oregon State University College of Forestry, wrote a letter to the prestigious scientific journal Science requesting that publication of a short forestry paper written by an OSU Forestry graduate student and others be delayed until the authors could respond to it, arguing the article was "short on qualifiers and context". The group requested alternatively that Science publish a sidebar illustrating their concerns alongside the paper. Science refused, and the paper, which had already undergo, and the paper, which had already undergo
|
| rdfs:label |
Biscuit Fire publication controversy
|
