| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/abstract
|
Bird v Bicknell [1987] 2 NZLR 542 is a cit … Bird v Bicknell [1987] 2 NZLR 542 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding fraud merely being a factor (albeit an important factor) in determining whether an exclusion clause is valid or not. It is contrasted with M E Torbett Ltd v Keirlor Motels Ltd where is held that an exclusion clause is simply not valid where a party has committed fraud.t valid where a party has committed fraud.
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/thumbnail
|
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Coat_of_arms_of_New_Zealand.svg?width=300 +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageExternalLink
|
http://www.nzlii.org/nz/cases/NZHC/1987/277.pdf +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageID
|
44070596
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageLength
|
1928
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageRevisionID
|
905996737
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageWikiLink
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Fraud +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/High_Court_of_New_Zealand +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/New_Zealand +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/M_E_Torbett_Ltd_v_Keirlor_Motels_Ltd +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:1987_in_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:1987_in_New_Zealand_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Exclusion_clause +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Court_of_Appeal_of_New_Zealand_cases +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Chemical_process +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:New_Zealand_contract_case_law +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/citations
|
[1987] 2 NZLR 542
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/court
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/High_Court_of_New_Zealand +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/dateDecided
|
"1987-09-23"^^xsd:date
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/fullName
|
David Bird and Denise Beatrix Bird v Janice Bicknell, Dominic Faanoi, Dennise Faanoi, Ceedric Rodrigues and Robert Martin
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/judges
|
Hillyer J
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/name
|
Bird v Bicknell
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/transcripts
|
http://www.nzlii.org/nz/cases/NZHC/1987/277.pdf +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Use_dmy_dates +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Reflist +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:NewZealand-case-law-stub +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Infobox_court_case +
|
| http://purl.org/dc/terms/subject
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Court_of_Appeal_of_New_Zealand_cases +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:New_Zealand_contract_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:1987_in_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:1987_in_New_Zealand_law +
|
| http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/hypernym
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Case +
|
| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bird_v_Bicknell?oldid=905996737&ns=0 +
|
| http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/depiction
|
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Coat_of_arms_of_New_Zealand.svg +
|
| http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/isPrimaryTopicOf
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bird_v_Bicknell +
|
| owl:sameAs |
http://rdf.freebase.com/ns/m.012228dt +
, https://global.dbpedia.org/id/n1ER +
, http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q18358444 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Bird_v_Bicknell +
|
| rdf:type |
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase +
|
| rdfs:comment |
Bird v Bicknell [1987] 2 NZLR 542 is a cit … Bird v Bicknell [1987] 2 NZLR 542 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding fraud merely being a factor (albeit an important factor) in determining whether an exclusion clause is valid or not. It is contrasted with M E Torbett Ltd v Keirlor Motels Ltd where is held that an exclusion clause is simply not valid where a party has committed fraud.t valid where a party has committed fraud.
|
| rdfs:label |
Bird v Bicknell
|
